[arin-ppml] IPv4 Run Out Proposals

David Farmer farmer at umn.edu
Mon Jul 27 15:11:44 EDT 2009

I've been meaning to ask this for several weeks now, where 
has the summer gone?

Leo and I are the AC Shepards for the two IPv4 Run Out 
Proposals, they are;

93. Predicable IPv4 Run Out by Prefix Size 

94. Predictable IPv4 Run Out by Allocation Window

Leo, I, and I believe much of the AC, think that these proposals 
shouldn't move forward separately, but that one or the other, or 
a merged version of the two, should move forward to Draft 
Policy to be discussed at ARIN XXIV in Dearborn.

Therefore, Leo and I would like feed back on these two 
proposals, and your ideas on the following options;

1. Should they be merged together and move forward as a 
single Draft Policy?

2. Should "Predicable IPv4 Run Out by Prefix Size" move 
forward to Draft Policy alone?

3. Should "Predictable IPv4 Run Out by Allocation Window" 
move forward to Draft Policy alone?

4. Should they move forward as two separate Draft Policies?

5. Should they both be abandoned? 

In order to make it on to the agenda for Dearborn, Draft Policy 
text must be ready for Staff and Legal Review by the end of 
this week.  

So please get any suggestions you have in as soon as 
possible, I'm going to start on a merged version of the text in 
case the consensus is to go that way, I will share it on PPML in 
the next day or two.

Thank you for your feed back.

David Farmer                                      Email:farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
Networking & Telecomunication Services
University of Minnesota		       Phone: 612-626-0815
2218 University Ave SE		       Cell: 612-812-9952
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029	       FAX: 612-626-1818

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list