[arin-ppml] IPV4 allocations
michael at rancid.berkeley.edu
Sun Jan 4 03:26:34 EST 2009
On 1/3/09 8:35 PM, Artur (eBoundHost) wrote:
> I disagree with one point. If ARIN is going to give ips on a per need basis then we also need to consider whether isps are doing the same.
> If for example end users comprise half of usable ip space and we can hold off the ip depletion by asking isps to only allow public ips on a per need basis then its entirely reasonable.
> For instance, our customers are given ips only if they have certain criteria and everyone else is hosted on a shared block. No reason isps can't do the same.
What is a "shared block" in this context? NAT? If so, you won't have
me as your customer unless you offer me end-to-end IPv6 as well.
In the R&E community, dissatisfaction with NAT has driven IPv6
deployment. Perhaps you plan to bring the same to the commercial ISP
More information about the ARIN-PPML