[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-6: Emergency TransferPolicyforIPv4 Addresses - Last Call
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 09:40:18 EST 2009
I guess Bill but again I argue that customers don't care about IPv6. They
want ISPs to continue to build the highway and provide a service that gets
them to where they want to go. If ISPs run out of address space, well to a
customer that's just poor planning and they'll go somewhere else. I don't
think ISPs have to sell IPv6 to customers. Customers will take IPv6 if it
gets them where they want to go. I still argue that the fact that their
highway is IPv6 should be transparent to the customer. The ISP sells a
service and it may or may not include IPv6. The customer wants to
buy/sell/surf/etc.... The lower level protocols should be transparent to
them. No one sells OSPF, IS-IS, or BGP to a customer either. The
customers just don't care. The only thing I can see a customer may care
about IPv6 is being able to get a large block of address space but again
that's part of a service.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Bill Darte <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
> .... cja at daydream.com...wrote...
> I guess I am still waiting for someone to come up with the killer
> application for IPv6. Or a marketing scheme... get this new
> service/speed/whatever if you sign up for IPv6. Of course you have to have
> IPv6 deployed to sell it as part of a service.
> Seems to me the sell is... the future comes with IPv6...we(as an ISP) offer
> that service now.. if you want to be part of the future, come with us....
> (then a little FUD about what happens if you don't get on board) ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML