[arin-ppml] 2008-6 What should the AC do

Scott Beuker scott.beuker at sjrb.ca
Fri Jan 2 16:04:56 EST 2009

I oppose the policy as written, and would like to see it abandoned (4)
or if not then given back to the author to revise to address concerns
raised (3).



Scott Beuker


From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:53 PM
To: PPML ppml
Subject: [arin-ppml] 2008-6 What should the AC do


I'm glad to see a vigorous discussion about 2008-6 on the mailing list.


However, since this proposal is in last call, there's a limited set of

for the AC to make about the policy...


Quoting from the ARIN web site:


	The Advisory Council will review the comments collected during
the last call period and may: 1) support the proposal as is and
recommend that the Board of Trustees adopt, 2) find minor revisions are
necessary in which case the Advisory Council or author will redraft and
post again to last call, 3) find major revisions are needed in which
case the Advisory Council or author will redraft and the proposal will
be posted for the next public policy meeting, or 4) find community
support to abandon the proposal.


So, I would like to encourage members of the community commenting

on this proposal to express clearly which of the above four actions

you believe the AC should take.


I have seen the discussion range through all 4 options and it is not

clear to me that there is any level of community consensus around

any one of these options.






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090102/9ccc646b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list