[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Protective Usage TransferPolicyfor IPv4 Address

Kevin Kargel kkargel at polartel.com
Tue Feb 10 14:38:46 EST 2009

> However, I have one small worry CriticalInfrastructure.NET and
> ISP.NET don't actually have a contract, that contract doesn't
> have anything specific about revocation of address
> assignments in it, or worse yet what the contract says is
> completely unreasonable, then what?

Working without a contract on a non-portable IP would be just bad
administration.  I do not think ARIN is responsible nor should they watchdog
network infrastructure..

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090210/159ad6db/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list