[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Protective Usage TransferPolicyfor IPv4 Address
kkargel at polartel.com
Tue Feb 10 14:38:46 EST 2009
> However, I have one small worry CriticalInfrastructure.NET and
> ISP.NET don't actually have a contract, that contract doesn't
> have anything specific about revocation of address
> assignments in it, or worse yet what the contract says is
> completely unreasonable, then what?
Working without a contract on a non-portable IP would be just bad
administration. I do not think ARIN is responsible nor should they watchdog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML