[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Protective Usage TransferPolicyfor IPv4 Address

Martin Hannigan martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Tue Feb 10 14:21:51 EST 2009

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:

> In a message written on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:25:15PM -0600, David Farmer
> wrote:
> > However, I have one small worry CriticalInfrastructure.NET and
> > ISP.NET don't actually have a contract, that contract doesn't
> > have anything specific about revocation of address
> > assignments in it, or worse yet what the contract says is
> > completely unreasonable, then what?
[ snip ]

> >
> > 2. ARIN Policy seem to recognize ISPs have an obligation to
> > "allow sufficient time for the renumbering process to be
> > completed before requiring the address space to be returned",
> > NRPM
> And the critical infrastructure has had 11 years to do just that,
> and two more if they start now.  IMHO posting this policy now is
> admission that they know of the problem well in advance, thus killing
> any chance that I might have sympathy that a sale was "sprung on
> them".

Why do they have two years? These sales are taking place now, and



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090210/0c7d8f73/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list