[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Protective Usage Transfer Policy for IPv4 Address

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Feb 10 09:17:27 EST 2009


ARIN has a policy for micro-allocations to critical infrastructure:

https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four4

Wouldn't it make more sense for critical infrastructure to get a
block under this policy and renumber into it, thus being free from
any concerns?  This can in fact be done now, well in advance of an
upstream trying to sell a block.

It doesn't seem like good policy for a mostly free large block to
be kept from being used by a relatively small critical infrastructure
block.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090210/8c17f842/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list