[arin-ppml] Simplified IPv6 policy

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Wed Dec 23 17:06:06 EST 2009

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:

> > What IPv6 policy would you favor here?
> I favor an IPv6 policy that makes sense and one in
> which ISPs could feasibly change their filtering
> rules to accomodate the new policy. I would not
> worry about which ISP acts first and which ones
> wait and see for a year or so. If the policy is
> sensible, then everyone will eventually fall
> in line, more or less.
> We had this same discussion when I was on the
> AC and we wanted to reduce the minimum ISP
> allocation from /19 to /20. I believed that
> ISPs would eventually change their filters.
> And they did, eventually.

Ok, so sounds like you'd support a lot of the minor changes being proposed.
What about the major rewrites of IPv6 policy, like Bill's proposal 103, and
my rewrite of some of the same ideas?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20091223/f38067c9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list