[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Wed Dec 16 22:54:36 EST 2009

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:51 PM, cja at daydream.com <packetgrrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone...
> I have seen virtually no comments regarding this policy.  I can't imagine
> there is a lack of opinion out there...

Hi Cathy,

A) Proposal 101 does no harm relative to the rest of existing IPv6 policy.

B) Proposal 101 is a superficial change to a fundamentally flawed policy.

C) As it is presently impossible to multihome in IPv6 using a /44
cutout of an ISP's /32, proposal 101 doesn't make technical sense.

I decline to support or oppose proposal 101.

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list