[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocationcriteria - revised

[David Farmer]

Martin Hannigan wrote:
> 
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Member Services wrote:
> 
>>
>> Modify item letter "d." under section 6.5.1.1. Initial allocation
>> criteria to the following:
>>
>> d. be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region
>>
>> or
>>
>> have a plan for making at least 200 end-site assignments to other
>> organizations within 5 years
>>
>> or
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Isn't being in the ARIN region already implied and why do we keep 
> perpetuating this ambiguous language? Why can't we write in english and 
> write something like:

How about even more clear, IMHO;

Have an existing IPv4 ISP allocation from ARIN, or have a plan for 
making at least 200 end-site assignments to other organizations within 5 
years.



-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota	
2218 University Ave SE	    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================