[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 106: Simplified IPv6 policy
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Tue Dec 29 19:22:35 EST 2009
On 12/29/2009 3:32 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Member Services wrote:
>> 6.3.1. Residential Customer Privacy ''(Copied from NRPM 184.108.40.206)''
>> To maintain the privacy of their residential customers, an organization
>> with downstream residential customers may substitute that organization's
>> name for the customer's name, e.g. 'Private Customer - XYZ Network', and
>> the customer's street address may read 'Private Residence'. Each private
>> downstream residential reassignment must have accurate upstream Abuse
>> and Technical POCs visible on the WHOIS record for that block.
> Looking for a little clarification...
> If I'm either lazy, or otherwise feel that NONE of my residential
> clients require a SWIP entry, does this piece of the policy allow me to
> reserve a portion of my /32 (eg. /44) for residential clients and SWIP
> the entire thing as a whole as 'Private Customer Block - XYZ Network' as
> opposed to SWIPing each individual /56 as private?
I'm going to start a new thread to reply to this, as this is existing
policy text, not something that this proposal would change...
> Besides that, and until someone comes up with a better metric than 'N
> hosts' as a qualification,
If anyone has suggestions for a better metric, please share. But IMO
this policy proposal is structured to make it easy to change that metric
later, so I'm not too worried about it if we have to wait until we have
some experience with IPv6-only networks before we decide what it should
be changed to.
> I support this policy.
Thanks for expressing your opinion directly.
More information about the ARIN-PPML