[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 54, Issue 98/leo

[RudOlph Daniel]

Leo, I do believe that due to changing global dynamics that we should not
sit on our backsides but engineer a v6 transition by any means necessary.
China "will" be more aggressive than the US in this regard.
RD

>
>
> http://www.marbridgeconsulting.com/marbridgedaily/2009-12-22/article/32322/china_telecom_ipv6_to_see_commercial_launch_in_2012
>
> While the 2012 timeline to launch IPv6 is interesting (and, at least
> to me a tad disappointing) more interesting is that they have already
> set a schedule of 2015 to start retreating from IPv4.
>
> I've long aruged the overlap period will be shorter, not longer due to
> the cost of running dual networks.  China Telecom would seem to agree
> with such an agressive timeline.
>
> --
>       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 826 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20091224/708d14ee/attachment-0001.bin
> >
>
>

-- 
Rudi Daniel
Independent Consultants
http://www.svgpso.org
http://danielcharles.weebly.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20091225/55324e6e/attachment.htm>