[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria

[Chris Grundemann]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 20:47, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like a step in the right direction.
>
> But... here's a question for ARIN staff:
>
> If an organization gets an ORG ID, gets an allocation from their ISP, and
> starts reassigning space to customers (and SWIP'ing it), does that make them
> a "known ISP"?

I am under the impression that you must have an existing ARIN
allocation to be a "known ISP" in the ARIN region.

>
> If so, then this policy may not actually change anything.
>
> If not, then perhaps we could just change 6.5.1.1 (d) to read "be an
> existing LIR in the ARIN region"?

I am not positive on the wording but I think I like this approach.

>
> -Scott
>
> On 12/16/2009 9:51 PM, cja at daydream.com wrote:
>
> Hi everyone...
> I have seen virtually no comments regarding this policy.  I can't imagine
> there is a lack of opinion out there...
> Happy Holidays!
> -----Cathy
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Member Services <info at arin.net> wrote:
>>
>> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
>> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with Policy Development
>> Process.
>>
>> This proposal is in the first stage of the Policy Development Process.
>> ARIN staff will perform the Clarity and Understanding step. Staff does
>> not evaluate the proposal at this time, their goal is to make sure that
>> they understand the proposal and believe the community will as well.
>> Staff will report their results to the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) within
>> 10 days.
>>
>> The AC will review the proposal at their next regularly scheduled
>> meeting (if the period before the next regularly scheduled meeting is
>> less than 10 days, then the period may be extended to the subsequent
>> regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how to utilize the
>> proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
>>
>> In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on
>> the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
>> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
>> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
>>
>> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>>
>> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>>
>> Mailing list subscription information can be found
>> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Member Services
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>>
>>
>> ## * ##
>>
>>
>> Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria
>>
>> Proposal Originator: Chris Grundemann
>>
>> Proposal Version: 1
>>
>> Date: 30 October 2009
>>
>> Proposal type: modify
>>
>> Policy term: permanent
>>
>> Policy statement:
>>
>> Modify item number 4 under section 6.5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria
>> to the following:
>>
>> 4. be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for
>> making at least 200 end-site assignments to other organizations within
>> 5 years or, if multihomed, demonstrate the efficient utilization of a
>> minimum contiguous or noncontiguous /44 (sixteen /48s) from an
>> upstream.
>>
>> Rationale:
>>
>> The bar for obtaining initial IPv4 allocations is lower for those ISPs
>> which are multi-homed, it stands to reason that it also be lower in
>> IPv6.  Since efficient utilization is based on the use of /48s, this
>> policy would effectively allow any ISP with 15 active customers (with
>> one /48 each and one /48 for the ISPs own network) to receive an initial
>> allocation of an IPv6 /32 from ARIN. I think this is a better approach
>> than removing or lowering the end-site assignment requirement for _all_
>> ISPs while still providing more open access to IPv6.
>>
>> Timetable for implementation: immediate
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>





-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org