[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria
bill at herrin.us
Wed Dec 16 22:54:36 EST 2009
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:51 PM, cja at daydream.com <packetgrrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone...
> I have seen virtually no comments regarding this policy. I can't imagine
> there is a lack of opinion out there...
A) Proposal 101 does no harm relative to the rest of existing IPv6 policy.
B) Proposal 101 is a superficial change to a fundamentally flawed policy.
C) As it is presently impossible to multihome in IPv6 using a /44
cutout of an ISP's /32, proposal 101 doesn't make technical sense.
I decline to support or oppose proposal 101.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML