[arin-ppml] The non-deployment of IPv6
steve at ibctech.ca
Sat Dec 12 18:27:42 EST 2009
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Tony Hain wrote:
>> Why do you say multi-homing is unrealistic? Do ARIN policies keep you from
>> getting a PI /48? If so that needs to be fixed. If not, your complaint would
>> appear to be an artificial justification for delaying.
> At check point we asked for and obtained ipv6 pi space under the current
> ARIN number policy, although it's been while since I've done it for ipv4
> I wouldn't characterize it as either dramatically different or hard.
I concur with Joel and Tony.
Although I'm not in a position to request PI space, where I had a hard
time was informing ARIN that a /32 was too much for my needs (and I
_still_ received it, due to policy).
If anyone, anywhere feels that ARIN policy is a barrier to entry, then I
personally beg you to just put in the request for the address space
regardless of what the policy states.
ARIN will not beat you with a stick for asking. As it goes, the worst
someone can say is 'no'. If they do happen to say 'no', they will be
able to refer to the specific sub-section of the policy as to why.
Then, you come back here to this list, post your complaint, and we
*will* change the policy. That is what this list is for.
_I_ want to ensure that there is no way in hell that anyone can complain
that their barrier to entry was the inability to acquire address space.
More information about the ARIN-PPML