[arin-ppml] SWIPs & IPv6

[Lee Howard]

John Curran wrote:
> > Under this philosophical approach, what would ARIN's responsibilities
> >be with respect to an organization which files no SWIP's and runs no
> > rwhois service?

Ted responded:
> My $0.02 is that the current obligations are nothing. (assuming the org
> never again requests more numbering)

"No obligation" might mean not accepting requests to change POC data,
or update ip6.arpa records, or maintaining their PPML subscription, or
honoring their vote for Board and AC, or maintaining the uniqueness of
their allocation, or retaining their WHOIS entry.   How far should ARIN 
not go?

Lee



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20091202/db150407/attachment.htm>