[arin-ppml] Update on 2009-3: Global Policy for the Allocationof IPv4 Blocks to RIRs
kkargel at polartel.com
Mon Aug 17 16:27:41 EDT 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:20 PM
> To: William Herrin
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Update on 2009-3: Global Policy for the
> Allocationof IPv4 Blocks to RIRs
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 12:59 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Owen DeLong<owen at delong.com> wrote:
> >>>> Where authorized by their respective chosen policies and
> >>>> strategies,
> >>>> each RIR shall designate IPv4 address space recovered from its
> >>>> registrants for return to the IANA.
> >> Bill's language sounds like all resources recovered under our
> >> policies
> >> should be returned to IANA. I am not comfortable with that wording.
> > Would you be happier with "where permitted" or "where allowed" instead
> > of "where authorized?" Perhaps, "To the extent permitted by".
> > Fill in the blank man: _______, each RIR shall designate IPv4 address
> > space recovered from its registrants for return to the IANA.
> The problem is SHALL.
> s/shall/may/ and most of the preceding words work.
The problem with "may" in the absence of "may not" is that then the entire
clause is no longer policy but only a suggestion. There are better venues
for suggestions than in policy.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML