[arin-ppml] Multihomed Microallocations

Ted Mittelstaedt tedm at ipinc.net
Wed Aug 5 15:55:05 EDT 2009

William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:51 PM, David Farmer<farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
>> On Aug 4 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> The existing section 4.4 does not in any way encompass what I think
>>> your talking about with "small user" entry.
>> Ted,
>> I'm glad you mentioned this, I kind of missed that.
>> Bill,
>> Is the intent that this actually replace section 4.4 Micro-allocation, which
>> is about critical infrastructure micro-allocations. I think it is very
>> important for critical infrastructure micro-allocations to be retained. They
>> are for very different purposes, and the need for critical infrastructure
>> micro-allocations is independent of this proposed policy. I don't support
>> eliminating critical infrastructure micro-allocations at all.
> This is an "I can't read a table of contents" error. 'doh! Make mine
> 4.11 instead of 4.4.
> Though 4.4 and 4.9 could be reasonably replaced by the proposed
> policy, that action should be taken separately *after* the proposed
> policy proves out in practice.

We all need to do some typo/logic overview revising of our proposals I 


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list