[arin-ppml] Did 2008-6 provide what Board needed?

[Stacy Hughes]

Hi,Also, we have to remember in the ARIN region a /10 out of the Last /8 is
reserved for facilitating IPv6 deployment under NRPM section 4.10.
Stacy

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, the projection on http://ipv4.potaroo.net does account for the
> new global policy. I added this last year, so that IANA exhaustion
> effectively occurs at the point when there are 5 remaining /8s in the
> IANA unallocated pool.
>
> The consumption of IPv4 addresses continues to decline in relative
> terms, and the projected exhaustion dates continue to push out by a
> few months (http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/predict.png shows the
> predicted exhaustion date over time). The current consumption rate of
> around 12 /8s per year looks rather stable at the moment (
> http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4-alloc/fig25.png
> ) so the 27 remaining IANA /8s look like taking a little over 2 years
> to be used.
>
> regards,
>
>    Geoff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15/04/2009, at 5:09 AM, David Farmer wrote:
>
> > On 14 Apr 2009 John Schnizlein wrote:
> >
> >> Should the start be calculated from exhaustion of IANA's free pool?
> >> Recall that IANA's exhaustion will happen sooner than otherwise by
> >> the
> >> policy to disperse the last five /8s among the RIRs as soon as the
> >> normal allocations reach the last 5.  Actual exhaustion of free IPv4
> >> addresses happens when the RIR exhausts its pool.  Various proposals
> >> focussed on fairness toward the end might slow consumption of the
> >> RIR's pool still more.
> >
> > Actually further done in my email I think I deal with that, at
> > least for my safety trigger and the automatic extension.  I
> > reference NRPM 10.4.2.1 and 10.4.2.2 which is where the /8s
> > for the RIR are reserved and handed out.   However, I didn't
> > correct for that when basing the projected run on from mid-
> > 2011, on picking the specfic dates.
> >
> > Geoff,
> >
> > Does projection on potaroo.net, account for the new global
> > policy: "End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to RIRs" and the
> > last /8 that it reserves for each RIR?
> >
> > Could you add that?  Or is the a different projection that
> > accounts for that you can point me to?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> Your goal of providing less uncertainty is a good one.  Let's not
> >> arrange a transfer policy experiment to expire just after the lack of
> >> free addresses makes it more important.
> >>
> >> John
> >
> >
> > ================================================
> > =======
> > David Farmer                               Email:
> > farmer at umn.edu
> > Office of Information Technology
> > Networking & Telecomunication Services
> > University of Minnesota                            Phone:     612-626-
> > 0815
> > 2218 University Ave SE                             Cell:
> > 612-812-9952
> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029                 FAX:       612-626-
> > 1818
> > ================================================
> > =======
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090415/62508ad3/attachment.htm>