[arin-ppml] Should we regularly poll the PPML about all draft policies?

[Milton L Mueller]

A regular schedule with multiple issues would diminish (but not eliminate) listserv electioneering....good idea.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Scott Leibrand
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: Joe Maimon
> Cc: 'ARIN PPML'
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Should we regularly poll the PPML about all draft
> policies?
> 
> Heh.  Perhaps we need a poll about whether to take a poll about taking
> polls.  :-)
> 
> I like the idea of having a single regularly scheduled poll, which
> contains questions about support for every draft policy, as well as any
> additional questions the AC decides would be useful for individual draft
> policies.  In any event, we'll discuss this at one of our upcoming AC
> calls, and I'm guessing will have something implemented for the next
> policy cycle.
> 
> Additional feedback on whether/how we should structure things is of
> course still welcome.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> Joe Maimon wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > A poll to accompany last call on the list for proposal discussion
> > would probably be good idea. Not quite sure its a good idea as well to
> > make it mandatory or binding.
> >
> > I suppose a poll on the proposal for polls on proposal is in order.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> > Scott Leibrand wrote:
> >> Jeremy, Joe, and others,
> >>
> >> ARIN does have a survey mechanism, which allows us to collect
> >> feedback from subscribed PPML participants (and ensures each
> >> subscriber only responds once).  We currently don't use it on a
> >> regular basis: If I recall correctly, the last poll was on 2008-2.
> >>
> >> One thing we could do is poll the PPML on all draft policies, in
> >> advance of each public policy meeting.  Is that the kind of thing
> >> you're thinking would be a good idea?  Does anyone else have an
> >> opinion on this?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> Jeremy H.Griffith wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:23:15 -0400, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at chl.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Perhaps a more formal method to indicate consensus or lack thereof
> >>>> on this list for proposals is in order, I imagine manual analysis
> >>>> of list posting traffic is imprecise and tedious.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> I like that idea.  Maybe something like SurveyMonkey?  Or the
> >>> sort of polls used on Yahoo Groups?
> >>>
> >>> --JHG <jhg at omsys.com>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PPML
> >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> >>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.