[arin-ppml] Should we regularly poll the PPML about alldraftpolicies?

[Scott Beuker]

g) You don't support a policy that would allow for the transfer of
   space which was only acquired less than <n> years ago

Here's an alternative to all this... ask if the voter supports a
given policy proposal as written, and if they answer anything other
than yes (no, haven't decided, I don't care), allow them to
express their reason in 250 characters or less.

When the results are disseminated, make the various comments
available for those who wish to read them.

With complicated and controversial policy proposals like we're
seeing lately, you're never going to be able to nail down all the
reasons people might not support them.

- Scott

> > 1) Do you support 2008-6 as written?
> > 2) Do you support 2009-1 as written?
> > 3) If you answered "No" to (2), is it because:
> > 	a) You don't support the emergency action
> > 	b) You don't support the removal of the sunset clause
> > 	c) Both (a) and (b)
> 
> 	d) You don't support the re-definition of "organization"
> 	e) You don't support the extention of the policy to IPv6
> 	f) You don't support the extention of the policy to other ARIN
> 		number resources.  (I can't remember what the magic
> 		network number is called, and the ARIN web site is dead
> 		in the water.  What a waste of time!  #$(*#$*((!)
>