[arin-ppml] The AC has a job to do with 2009-1, can you please help?

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Sat Apr 4 17:45:55 EDT 2009


That seems like a good way to restore the original sunset date, which  
would've been 3 years from IANA exhaustion if the Board hadn't found  
it necessary to implement 2008-6 beforehand.

-Scott

On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:

> In a message written on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:04:58AM -0700, Owen  
> DeLong wrote:
>> While I am one of the strongest supporters of the sunset clause idea,
>> I think that 2010 would be far too early.  IANA runout will probably
>> occur
>> somewhere in 2010-2011.  I think that we will need at least 2-3  
>> years of
>> this policy after that date for it to be at all meaningful.  Would  
>> you
>> accept a 12/31/2013 date?
>
> I'm thinking outloud, so I'm not sure I'd support this myself, but
> what about making the run-out date "3 years after IANA has handed
> out the last /8"?
>
> That way we don't have to guess at when we're out of space now with a
> fixed date.
>
> -- 
>       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list