[arin-ppml] The AC has a job to do with 2009-1, can you please help?

[Jeremy H.Griffith]

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:33:06 -0700, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> 
wrote:

>Sure; I still OPPOSE this policy. Maybe if it is changed to:
>
>* IPv4 only. Explicitly exclude AS numbers and IPv6.
>* Add a sunset clause that nullifies the policy after X date, where X is
>reasonable and agreed upon through this process, not in the year 3000.

+1, with a date *no later* than 12/31/2010, and:

* Eliminate that absurd definition of an organization.

But even then, I'd still OPPOSE it for creating a market,
when I saw hardly any support for 2008-6 in that respect 
either, just lots of noise from the one or two who did
support making lots of money at everyone's expense.  And...

"The Advisory Council will review the draft policy within 5 
business days of the end of the discussion period and make a 
recommendation to the Board of Trustees."

I really hope that recommendation takes full account of the
nonsupport by the community of this entire policy hijacking.

Is there a petition process for recall of Trustees for cause?
And do the hypothetical "minutes" yet to be released identify
those voting for 2009-1 by name?  Just wondering.  ;-)

--JHG <jhg at omsys.com>