[arin-ppml] clarification of Board actions Feb 2 and Mar 18, 2009
Stephen Sprunk
stephen at sprunk.org
Thu Apr 2 17:15:53 EDT 2009
Bill Darte wrote:
>
> So do you think ARIN needs to ask for all address space to be
> re-justified, documented and when there is obvious under-utilization
> they reclaim it?
>
See section 12 of the most recent NRPM (aka 2007-14).
I would debate "all", and I would encourage the BoT to rein in staff if
they even started heading in that direction, but the policy is now in
place and it was the intent of the proposal's authors that staff _would_
soon start reviewing resources that are suspected of being
under-utilized and/or abandoned.
Getting a jump on this now -- before the pool is depleted and the
transfer market starts in earnest -- is certainly in the interests of
the community, because it keeps the "intergovernmental organizations"
that want to take over address allocations from an easy claim to the
moral high ground.
S
--
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20090402/3395165b/attachment.bin>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list