[arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
kkargel at polartel.com
Mon Sep 29 11:17:48 EDT 2008
I still believe that a transfer policy at all is a bad idea and do not
support any form.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Bill Darte
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:01 AM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: [arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for
> IPv4 Addresses
> As the Oct 15 ARIN Public Policy Meeting comes closer, I
> would like to again ask anyone who has not commented (or
> sufficiently) on this policy proposal to do so. Especially,
> I am interested in what you think are the positive or
> negative aspects of this proposal in contrast to 2008-2 the
> more elaborate and detailed proposal.
> 2008-6 was promulgated as an alternative to 2008-6 for those
> who believe that 1./ a more liberal transfer policy is in the
> best interest of the industry and, 2./ feel that it would be
> easier to pass it and then modify it as needed in the future,
> should 2008-2 fail to gain consensus across all of its nuance.
> As always, I thank you for your involvement and insight into
> the policy evaluation process of ARIN. Your participation
> makes the role of the AC much easier and the overall process
> more rigorous.
> Bill Darte
> ARIN Advisory Council
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3107 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML