[arin-ppml] ["Lying Idle"]

Scott Leibrand sleibrand at internap.com
Wed Oct 22 12:19:40 EDT 2008

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:03:56PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> I had 3 legacy blocks which I was the primary  
>> contact for.  I had misunderstood the RSA contract to mean that these  
>> blocks were covered under the RSA I signed for new blocks assigned.   
>> This situation persisted for 13 years (admittedly 2 of which predate  
>> ARIN) without me ever *EVER* receiving a single e-mail from ARIN  
>> saying "This block is not covered by an RSA.  Would you please fill  
>> this out and return it?" or any variant thereof.
> 	then our experiences differ. I've received mail from ARIN
> 	about a series of resources that were assigned pre-ARIN and would	
> 	would I be willing to place them under some form of RSA.
> 	Granted, the contacts have been in the last 24 months, so there
> 	have been years when ARIN was busy w/ other things.
> 	perhaps I was part of a pilot group, I don't know.  I do know
> 	that Leslie reported that some 14,000 cases were in process
> 	(where process was identification, notification, etc...)
> 	Its clear that you have not had the same experience as I have.
> 	I am confident that soon you will.  I have found that using the 
> 	secure login capability is very helpful in maintaining accurate 
> 	data about the resources under ones stewardship.

Per one of the presentations (Leslie's?), ARIN started with Class A legacy 
holders, then Class B, and is now just starting with Class C.  Most likely 
that accounts for the differences in whether/when each of you got notices.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list