[arin-ppml] Some observations on the differences in the various transfer policy proposals
sleibrand at internap.com
Sun Oct 19 21:47:46 EDT 2008
In your article you imply that the RIRs' registry functions are not the
proper lever from which to apply the various regulatory functions that the
community has indicated are needed. Where/how would you propose the
regulatory function reside / be applied instead?
Or, to put a more practical face on the same question: how do you propose
that the industry deal with the deaggregation that will result from the
widespread transfer of small netblocks (as allowed under prop-50)?
I agree that restricting deaggregation through regulating access to the
registry will not be 100% effective, but it seems more likely to be
effective than any alternative I've seen so far.
Geoff Huston wrote:
> At the ARIN meeting last week the question arose as to why the various
> policy proposals related to address transfers in the different RIRs
> were so different. I made some comments in response to this question
> from my perspective and then I had some followup questions mailed to
> me, so I thought maybe there is some value in writing up from my
> perspective. After all there is still some difference between the
> proposal(s) before ARIN and Proposal-50 before APNIC, and the
> question as to why this difference exists is an interesting one.
> If you are interested its at: http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2008-11/transfers.html
> Geoff Huston
> DIsclaimer: I'm speaking for myself, again!
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML