[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Recovery Fund
lear at cisco.com
Mon Nov 24 23:59:46 EST 2008
On 11/24/08 11:12 PM, Kevin Kargel wrote:
> [Kevin says:]
> US government organizations are not only considering conversion, but are
> already mandated to currently provide IPv6 connectivity on their
> backbones. This mandate was proclaimed way back in 2005. The same is
> true of many global governments, of whom the US is not the leading edge.
> US DoT are already using IPv6 on government circuits.. I don't know
> where you are getting your facts but these were fallacies that only
> promoted falsehood.
Really? And how about the California Department of Motor Vehicles, or
the Indiana Family & Social Services Agency or the Mexican Federales? I
don't know where you live, but how about your local department of
emergency services or your hospital? Are they v6 ready?
> One more statement, while it is good and necessary to maintain IPv4 for
> existing networks who do not wish to evolve, I do not think there is any
> moral imperative (in fact I think it is impossible) to maintain a steady
> supply of IPv4 for all comers forever. You can't get blood from a rock.
> Attempting to maintain a limitless supply of a finite resource is a
> certain way to fail.
Nobody said ANYTHING about a limitless supply. What many of us are
asking is what to do with a scarcity. Some of the above sites will need
address space, and their need will not go unmet, although the usefulness
of their service to the community may diminish.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML