[arin-ppml] 134.17.0.0/16

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:17:48PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > > As the holder of legacy space, I'm willing to pay the $100/yr maintenence
> > > > fee. It seems reasonable. I do object to the RSA which attempts to impose
> >                                                  ^^^
> > > > more restrictions on the space that what I originally agreed to.
> > > 
> > > as the president of a 501(c)(3) which holds legacy space, i saw LRSA as a
> >                                                                   ^^^^
> > > good thing, it modernized an ancient relationship, it codified ISC's
> > > rights, and it took away no right that i thought ISC had.  where did i go
> > > wrong, joe?
> > 
> > I don't see the disagreement. Before the LRSA, there was only the RSA.
> > LRSA != RSA.
> 
> the RSA wasn't applicable to legacy space, which is the subject of joe's words.
> _______________________________________________

	actually, a holder of legacy space could choose to place it
	under the current RSA, if they wanted to.  the Legacy Service
	Agreement is exclusively for legacy space.

--bill