[ppml] Policy to help the little guys

[Steven E. Petty]

  At this point, either of these would provide a better solution for my company.  Though the /29 would require segmenting some non-critical hosts to (presumably PA) other IP space.  A /28 would fit all that require external visibility.  So, I suppose the first complication would be whether our theoretical new /29 multihomed allocation had rules for justifying larger blocks...

-----Original Message-----
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:51 AM
To: David Williamson
Cc: arin ppml
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy to help the little guys

David Williamson wrote:
> If you can get a PA /24 for multi-homing, and anyone can, why can't
> you get PI?

as a gedanken experiment, and maintaining my reputation as a notorious trouble-maker, why not longer than /24?  e.g. take a /16 and create a well-known micro-swam of say /29s for multi-homed content sites.

i am not necessarily advocating this.  but i think the exercise of discussing the pros and cons might be good for us.

randy
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.