[ppml] Restrictions on transferor deaggregation in 2008-2: IPv4Transfer Policy Proposal
Kevin - Your.Org
kevin at your.org
Wed Mar 12 13:18:35 EDT 2008
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Howard, W. Lee wrote:
>> Right now I can go to any colo provider and say "I want a
>> half dozen racks, power, and connectivity for my 150
>> servers." and pretty easily get a /23 or larger. Now what
>> happens if I say "You know, why don't you forget about the
>> racks, power, bandwidth and everything else...
>> How much would just the /23 be per month?"
> 184.108.40.206 Downstream customer adherence
> ISPs must require their downstream customers to adhere to the
> following criteria:
> 220.127.116.11.1 Utilization
> Reassignment information for prior allocations must show that each
> customer meets the 80% utilization criteria and must be available
> via SWIP/RHWOIS prior to your issuing them additional space.
> . . .
> 18.104.22.168 Reassignments to multihomed downstream customers
> Under normal circumstances an ISP is required to determine the prefix
> size of their reassignment to a downstream customer according to the
> guidelines set forth in RFC 2050. Specifically, a downstream customer
> justifies their reassignment by demonstrating they have an immediate
> requirement for 25% of the IP addresses being assigned, and that they
> have a plan to utilize 50% of their assignment within one year of its
> . . .
Who said anything about not being utilized? The space will be
utilized, just not on a network directly connected.
Renter: "I would like to rent a /20."
ISP: "Okay, can you document and justify it?"
Renter: "Sure, here's my paperwork and network diagrams of how I plan
to use this space."
ISP: "Great, That will be $x/month."
Renter goes an announces the /20 through their existing transit
connections. If ISP doesn't want to appear to be renting the space
out, they might work out a deal where they'll announce it too, but
prepended to death.
For the record, I'm not saying I *support* doing this, and have
absolutely no plans to attempt this from either side. Just that I
don't see why it's not possible now.
More information about the ARIN-PPML