[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF

[Randy Bush]

> Is the recommendation then to; 1) hold fast with our existing policies,
> 2) pare down what we have, or 3) who cares because, as you say, it's
> just a matter of time before the professionals get involved?

<personal non-expert opinion>

i think the current proposals in apnic and arin are fair starting
points, and are honest attempts to move forward.  i suspect both are too
restrictive for my taste, e.g. apnic's nir shield.  but geoff's change
(at the meeting) to allow inter-region trading was a step forward.  and
i know nirs are weird and twisty passages.  and i have asked scott re
the issues that give me pause with his.

but they're probably a good start, and could be the basis of gaining
experience for a year or two.

randy