[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
randy at psg.com
Fri Mar 7 11:14:30 EST 2008
> Is the recommendation then to; 1) hold fast with our existing policies,
> 2) pare down what we have, or 3) who cares because, as you say, it's
> just a matter of time before the professionals get involved?
<personal non-expert opinion>
i think the current proposals in apnic and arin are fair starting
points, and are honest attempts to move forward. i suspect both are too
restrictive for my taste, e.g. apnic's nir shield. but geoff's change
(at the meeting) to allow inter-region trading was a step forward. and
i know nirs are weird and twisty passages. and i have asked scott re
the issues that give me pause with his.
but they're probably a good start, and could be the basis of gaining
experience for a year or two.
More information about the ARIN-PPML