[arin-ppml] Your views on ARIN Transfer Policy Proposal 2008-2
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Jul 16 05:35:38 EDT 2008
> For those of you who have continually expressed your views, I
> would still ask for your concise list as I believe the
> aggregate response from all participants will help point us
> all in the direction of consensus.
1. I do not believe that an address holder should be able to
negotiate a transfer of IP addresses separately from network
assets. This skates to close to conflicting with the statement
that numbers are not sold by ARIN.
2. The runout of the IANA free pool is a symptom of scarcity of
IPv4 addresses. I do not believe that there will be any
significant number of address blocks available for transfer
in a time of scarcity.
3. If an organization is willing to transfer an address block,
this means that they don't need it. Allowing them to transfer
these addresses is a violation of section 8 of the RSA.
4. The end result of this policy is that an address block that is
not needed by organization A will end up in the hands of
organization B. This can already be accomplished in accord
with ARIN policy and with the RSA, if organization A meets
its obligation and gives the addresses back to ARIN.
5. This policy proposal is too darn COMPLICATED with legal terminology
such as "safe harbor" which may or may not have special meanings
that are not obvious to PPML participants. ARIN policy has
generally only been as complex as the technology requires,
but this now adds layers of complexity that have nothing
whatsoever to do with technology.
6. Organizations who hold IP addresses will have to take the ARIN
relationship away from operational address administrators and
give it to their legal departments in order to make this kind
of policy work.
7. This policy attempts to engineer an IP address trading market
with clauses pulled out of thin air to do things like "discourage
speculation". This goes beyond ARIN's scope. I'm sure you will
point to article 7 paragraph 5 of the charter, but when I say
that it goes beyond ARIN's scope, I am saying it in broad terms
taking all 9 paragraphs of article 7 as an organic whole. Not just
three words (all and everything).
--Michael Dillon
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list