[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-16: Ipv4 Soft Landing - asimulation analysis

Bill Darte BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Thu Jan 31 07:47:09 EST 2008

a) revise 2007-16 to remove the change in allocation criteria but keep  
the requirements for documentation of transition plans (etc.)

------ I (personally) do not believe that it is within the scope of ARIN's mission to create policy that mandates IPv6 as a business practice in order to receive a requested resource (IPv4), when that resource is available.

b) abandon 2007-16 as a bad idea
c) do more simulation studies to see how different the answers might  
be given different assumptions

------ It would be easy for me to support this option given that I do not have the capability to do the work, but would be interested in the underlying assumptions that make a material impact..and their practicality.

------ Bill Darte

What do people think?

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080131/bc00ea42/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list