[ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois

Keith W. Hare Keith at jcc.com
Thu Jan 10 16:36:21 EST 2008


The advantage of a proposal is it would put the proposed change, the
existing stuff, and the logic for the change in one place. This would
make it easier to have a real discussion of the the technical

In the absence of real knowledge, my current opinion is that it doesn't
make sense to change this for IPv4, but it might for IPv6.  However, I
reserve the right to change my mind.


-----Original Message-----
From: Divins, David [mailto:dsd at servervault.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 3:38 PM
To: Keith W. Hare; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois

Would you support a proposal to change current ARIN SWIP policy (in

If more than the 4 or 5 that have shown support chime in, I may draft a


David Divins
Principal Engineer
ServerVault Corp.
(703) 652-5955
-----Original Message-----
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of
Keith W. Hare
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:21 AM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: ***POSSIBLE SPAM*** Re: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois

After all this discussion and hyperbole, is there an actual proposal to
change the current ARIN SWIP whois policy?

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if
you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list