[ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal

[Ray Plzak]

Raul,

The policies that have been proposed in the various regions thus far are all regional only. None attempt to bring in the global community. I see  nothing that precludes these policies from moving forward in their respective regions. Certainly in the discussions that take place in the individual regions, global implications have been and will be continued to be discussed. The communities should not have to wait for a global strategy in order to discuss the merits of various aspects of these proposals as they will have to be discussed in any event.


Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raul Echeberria [mailto:raul at lacnic.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:11 AM
> To: Ray Plzak; Randy Bush
> Cc: ppml at arin.net; sig-policy at apnic.net
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy
> Proposal
>
>
> Ray
>
> My point is that we first need a global strategy and later probably
> global and/or coordinated policies for implementing that strategy.
> And of course, I agree with you regarding commitments, and rest that
> you said.
>
> Raul
>
>
> At 09:45 a.m. 12/02/2008, Ray Plzak wrote:
> >Merely pointing out that there are implications to the use of the
> >term globally coordinated policy, a term that has been used many
> >times over the past several months, perhaps a little to glibly.
> >
> >Even a global and coordinated strategy will require commitments,
> >once made, must not be subject to disassembly by the subsequent
> >actions of a single RIR. Once that happens the global and
> >coordinated strategy is neither global or coordinated. Think locally
> >while acting globally is more than just a catchy phrase.
> >
> >Ray
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:38 AM
> > > To: Raul Echeberria
> > > Cc: Ray Plzak; ppml at arin.net; sig-policy at apnic.net
> > > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer
> Policy
> > > Proposal
> > >
> > > > I am not necessarily claiming for a global or a coordinated
> policy
> > > > (maybe yes), but for a global "and" coordinated strategy for
> dealing
> > > > with a global problem.
> > >
> > > too radical.  it is our right to think locally while acting
> globally.
> > > that's why there are five rirs, right?
> > >
> > > randy
> >
> >*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management
> >policy           *
> >_______________________________________________
> >sig-policy mailing list
> >sig-policy at lists.apnic.net
> >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1273 - Release Date:
> >12/02/2008 09:31 a.m.
>
>