[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-6

[Scott Leibrand]

Kevin Kargel wrote:
>> On 09.01.01 03:40, Kevin Kargel wrote:
>>     
>>> There will be (are) many small businesses who will need IP addresses
>>> and depend on them for their business who will not be able to afford
>>> them.
>>>       
>> i know asking folk to do the relevant reading gets repetitive, but you
>> might want to look at apnic proposal-0062, which did pass in christchurch.
>>
>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-062-v002.html
>>
>> randy
>>     
> An excellent policy and an excellent stalling tactic, but you must recognize
> it as a stalling tactic and not a policy that will support IPv4 growth in
> perpetuity.  
>
> Kevin
>   

I think we all agree that any sort of transfer policy is only 
transitional, and at best represents a way to more smoothly transition 
to IPv6.

-Scott