[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-6: Emergency Transfer PolicyforIPv4 Addresses - Last Call

Kevin Kargel kkargel at polartel.com
Mon Dec 29 12:25:34 EST 2008


I just want to put my two cents worth in yet again and say that I do not see
the need for any Emergency Transfer Proposal.  We already have ARIN who
already transfer IP's to and from users.  ARIN does a pretty darn good job.
The only reason for having the ETP is to create an artificial IP market for
profit taking.  Regardless of whether the policy states that its intention
is not to create such a market that will be the effect.  I will oppose any
such policy.

 

Kevin Kargel

 

  _____  

From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Bill Darte
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:12 AM
To: Cliff Bedore; arin ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-6: Emergency Transfer
PolicyforIPv4 Addresses - Last Call

 

Yes, I see your point about the 3 year duration.

I confess that this 'feature' was included to assuage concern by some that
an expanded transfer policy would forestall the coming of IPv6 by providing
'pressure relief'.  In this way, it sent a signal that this was NOT a policy
designed to preserve IPv4, but rather provide emergency relief.

Of course the policy could be extended or replaced at any time by the
community.

Bill Darte
ARIN AC


-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net on behalf of Cliff Bedore
Sent: Mon 12/29/2008 9:49 AM
To: arin ppml
Subject: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy
forIPv4 Addresses - Last Call

After reviewing all the other proposals regarding new methods of address
transfer, I think this offers the best and simplest method of allowing
transfers between two end users.  I think the start date is flexible enough
but I don't think the 3 year life should be kept.  I think the wording
should
allow it to run until superceded by new ARIN policy.  Things like this tend
to
develop a life of their own and it would be silly to have an arbitrary end
date if it continues to be useful.

The lightweightness (?) of the proposal will probably make it the most
likely
to succeed of all the proposals thus far and we should not have an arbitrary
end date for a successful policy.

Cliff

--
Cliff Bedore
7403 Radcliffe Dr. College Park MD 20740
cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com http://www.bdb.com
Amateur Radio Call Sign W3CB For info on ham radio, http://www.arrl.org/
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20081229/65aea162/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20081229/65aea162/attachment.bin>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list