[arin-ppml] LRSA concerns (Re: Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal)
bill at herrin.us
Thu Aug 21 15:25:27 EDT 2008
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Paul Vixie <vixie at isc.org> wrote:
> arguments of the form "LRSA is bad because of its inseverability" boil down
> to "i as a legacy holder do not want my use of this resource to be governed
> unless i happen to like the direction that governance is taking me"
Governance? Is that what the LRSA is about?
I thought LRSA was about normalizing the relationship between ARIN and
the resource holders who predate it, authenticating the resources (to
fight hijacking) and getting those holders to pay a fair share of the
whois/rdns operations cost.
Perhaps asking for the LRSA to also be about governance pushes the
legacy registrants further than they're currently willing to go.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML