[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal

Howard, W. Lee Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Wed Aug 20 08:18:17 EDT 2008


> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net 
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Loch
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:14 PM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity 
> Policy Proposal
> Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > gedanken experiment: if we wanted to have a carrot-rich stick-free 
> > relationship with legacy holders and whois registrants, 
> what might we 
> > do (other than shoot testosteronic lawyers:)?
> Allow them to transfer/sell their legacy blocks the same way 
> they can sell their legacy domain names (no strings 
> attached).  Allow them to subdivide the blocks up to whatever 
> the current ARIN minimum allocation  size is (currently /20). 

Are you advocating or gedankening?

>  Exclude utilization as a reason the delegation could be 
> revoked.  

See section 10(b) of the LRSA:
(b) ARIN will take no action to reduce the services provided for
Included Number Resources that are not currently being utilized by the
Legacy Applicant.

Also, the LRSA says that if there's a conflict between ARIN
policies and the LRSA, the LRSA wins.   Absent an LRSA, the community
could change the rules for legacy holders.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list