[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Wed Aug 20 08:18:17 EDT 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Loch
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:14 PM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity
> Policy Proposal
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > gedanken experiment: if we wanted to have a carrot-rich stick-free
> > relationship with legacy holders and whois registrants,
> what might we
> > do (other than shoot testosteronic lawyers:)?
> Allow them to transfer/sell their legacy blocks the same way
> they can sell their legacy domain names (no strings
> attached). Allow them to subdivide the blocks up to whatever
> the current ARIN minimum allocation size is (currently /20).
Are you advocating or gedankening?
> Exclude utilization as a reason the delegation could be
See section 10(b) of the LRSA:
(b) ARIN will take no action to reduce the services provided for
Included Number Resources that are not currently being utilized by the
Also, the LRSA says that if there's a conflict between ARIN
policies and the LRSA, the LRSA wins. Absent an LRSA, the community
could change the rules for legacy holders.
More information about the ARIN-PPML