[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal
tvest at pch.net
Tue Aug 19 19:45:55 EDT 2008
What carrot(s) would you suggest, that would not have the effect of
making "faithful" (i.e., complete, accurate, and timely) participation
in whois purely optional for all time thereafter? What carrots could
the RIRs offer to encourage "purely optional" participation without
the cost of such offerings effectively representing a big stick
applied to other community members?
Honestly curious about this, as I am having trouble imagining the kind
of simple, obvious solutions that you and others seem to suggest are
within our grasp...
On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> you seem to get the message and are articulating it well. though it
> not a pretty one.
> when my son was five or so, he moved some cows from one pasture to
> another. he came back and reported "you know, it is easier to move
> from in front with a can of grain than from behind with a stick."
> i know many folk far older who have not learned that lesson. arin
> seem not to have. power, force, coercion, extortion, ... not very
> gedanken experiment: if we wanted to have a carrot-rich stick-free
> relationship with legacy holders and whois registrants, what might
> we do
> (other than shoot testosteronic lawyers:)?
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML