[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal
sleibrand at internap.com
Tue Aug 19 14:48:03 EDT 2008
How does APNIC deal with this whole issue of historical addresses? What
do you think of their policy? (I've been following sig-policy, but I'm
still not quite sure I understand what the current policy is.)
Randy Bush wrote:
>> I wasn't involved in this proposal's drafting, but I believe it is in
>> the best interests of all concerned (*even* for those who elect not to
>> sign a legacy RSA) to require an action that is prima facie evidence
>> of fraud if it is undertaken by people who are not truly authorized to
>> do so before updating number resources data. This is not an attempt
>> at a shake-down for $100/year legacy RSA fee, it is an attempt to
>> better protect the assignment records for number resources that are
>> currently assigned to you or your organization.
> as i read it, legacy holders are required to sign the egregious rsa to
> get the benefit (the $100 does not bother me). can you say, "no way?"
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML