[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Whois Integrity Policy Proposal

[Randy Bush]

> I wasn't involved in this proposal's drafting, but I believe it is in
> the best interests of all concerned (*even* for those who elect not to
> sign a legacy RSA) to require an action that is prima facie evidence
> of fraud if it is undertaken by people who are not truly authorized to
> do so before updating number resources data.  This is not an attempt
> at a shake-down for $100/year legacy RSA fee, it is an attempt to
> better protect the assignment records for number resources that are
> currently assigned to you or your organization.

as i read it, legacy holders are required to sign the egregious rsa to
get the benefit (the $100 does not bother me).  can you say, "no way?"

randy