[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-21: Last Call

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:20:16PM -0500, Dale W. Carder wrote:
> I would think that it is a waste of time for anyone
> involved to do any sort of minor IPv4 reclamation and
> further inhibit the world's v6 rollout because of it.
> 
> Maybe I'm thinking too much along the lines of "Have an
> AS?  Here's your /48".

In an attempt to bring this full circle...

This policy is currently in "Last Call", which is the last opportunity
for the community to raise objections to the policy or the process
followed to get it here.

Do you believe there's any reason this policy should not be
implemented, or that the process was not followed?

What I'm hearing is that you would like to explore other policies
(e.g.  "Have an AS?  Here's your /48.", but that you have no specific
problems with this policy.  If that's incorrect, please let us know;
that's why we have this comment period!

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080415/4e122b90/attachment.sig>