[ppml] IPv6 assignment - proposal for change to nrpm
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Sat Oct 20 20:25:27 EDT 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Keith Medcalf
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 1:31 PM
> To: briand at ca.afilias.info
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 assignment - proposal for change to nrpm
> This is a very bad idea. The requirement that a "minumum"
> end-user site assignment of a /64 is the only thing that will
> permit many Legacy /24 holders (such as myself) who are
> single-homed use IPv6 at all.
Please clarify. I don't understand the correlation between
/64, Legacy /24, and single-homed.
> Either you have to require a minimum /64 PA end-user
> delegation by ISPs *or* you have to make it so that anyone
> who wants a /64 can qualify for a PIv6 /64 (or larger) direct
> The purpose of ARIN is *not* to ensure the profitability of
> carriers and ISPs by imposing unreasonable limits on the
> availability and usability of the network.
True. Are you suggesting that this proposal does that? In
> Therefore I would very actively and vocally oppose any such
> attempted change to policy.
*Thank you* for clearly stating your position on a proposal!
More information about the ARIN-PPML