[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-19 - Staff Assessment
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Oct 16 17:34:40 EDT 2007
On 15 Oct 2007, at 00:43, Member Services wrote:
> III. Comments
> A. ARIN Staff
> 1. The “Additional Allocations” section indicates an RIR can
> receive an additional ASN allocation when the RIR “has
> assigned/allocated 80% of the previously received ASN block”.
> After 12/31/2009, there will be no distinction made between 2
> AS numbers and 4 byte AS numbers per policy. Does “previously
> ASN block” literally mean the most recent ASN block (even if it was
> a 2
> byte only block), or does it mean 80% of both the most recent 4 byte
> block and the most recent 2 byte block? If it’s the latter, one ASN
> block would never be audited, since it would never be “the most recent
> ASN block allocated”.
I think that people would reasonably expect IANA to review both the
most recent 16-bit and 32-bit ASN allocations when evaluating a
request for an additional block after 2009.
More information about the ARIN-PPML