[ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
tedm at ipinc.net
Mon Oct 15 18:07:34 EDT 2007
>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>David S. Madole
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2:51 PM
>To: ppml at arin.net
>Subject: Re: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
>> From Ted Mittelstaedt [tedm at ipinc.net]
>>>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>>>David S. Madole
>>>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2:18 PM
>>>To: ppml at arin.net
>>>Subject: Re: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
>>>Can you explain
>>>the decision that a different RSA will never be offered to legacy
>Umm, real nice job with the creative quoting of my message but that wasn't
>at all the question I asked. I asked:
>> Can you explain your role in the process and
>> the decision that a different RSA will never be offered to legacy
>Those six words you edited out change the meaning quite a bit. It's a
>usual goal in (honest) editing and quoting not to change the meaning of
No, sorry they don't change the meaning.
Your talking like ARIN is an entity separate from the community. It isn't.
ARIN will do what the community wants. Right now the community has decided
wants to pursue outreach to the Legacy holders. Some Legacy holders
(understandably) don't want ARIN to outreach to them. Once outreach is
concluded, the community -and by extension, ARIN - will be through with
this issue and as I said, simply will not be interested in further
chasing after people who don't want to have anything to do with them. That
is why a second Legacy RSA won't be offered.
OK, I have answered your questions several times, now answer one of mine.
Why do YOU want multiple RSA's offered to Legacy holders? What do YOU
get out of it, why do YOU want this to happen? Do you think it would be a
good thing to have 4, 5, 6, 10, 15, 150, 500 different RSA's out there,
each tailored to some complainer?
More information about the ARIN-PPML