[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-21: PIv6 for legacy holders with

[William Herrin]

On 10/18/07, Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
> >  I oppose the policy proposal because all it really serves to do
> >  is grandfather the special treatment of legacy IPv4 space holders
> >  into the IPv6 world.
>
> This is the exact reason I also opposed the policy.

Andrew,

To me, the most important thing is that the fresh start actually
happen. I don't think that's inevitible. Double-NAT can be made to
work and when it does, 4B addresses is enough.

To my way of thinking, refusing to in some way grandfather the IPv4
legacy users, especially the multihomed ones, qualifies as "cutting
off your nose to spite your face."

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004