[ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Fri Nov 2 16:58:57 EDT 2007


In a message written on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:41:03PM -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Another take is that if the RIRs _were_ involved in routing policy, the 
> appropriate stakeholders and competent engineers would show up.

It is worth pointing out that in different regions this is handled
differently.  For instance, RIPE handles both the functions of Nanog
and of ARIN as a single org.

There are of course, pros and cons, but it is not impossible to
consider having routing policy and addressing policy under the same
umbrella.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20071102/30af6dd9/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list