[ppml] 240/4

[Marshall Eubanks]

On May 5, 2007, at 12:55 AM, vixie at vix.com wrote:

>> How much of the /4 would we need for rfc1918 type space?  Would a / 
>> 6 be
>> enough?
>
> i don't think so.  the folks who find 10/8 inadequate want a LOT  
> LOT LOT
> more, not just a little more.

In that case, why don't they adopt v6 and be done with it ?

Regards
Marshall

>
>> It might be wise to save the rest of it for future, as yet  
>> unimagined use.
>> I wonder if any of the various encapsulation approaches to id/ 
>> locator split
>> could make use of some of that space.
>
> there is no future for IPv4 nor any reason to reserve or  
> experiment.  we're
> just looking for some fumes to breathe while we finally take IPv6  
> seriously.
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML at arin.net).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml